<h1 id="some-notes-on-the-rdf-star-examples-of-profiles">Some Notes on the Rdf Star Examples of Profiles<a aria-hidden="true" class="anchor-heading icon-link" href="#some-notes-on-the-rdf-star-examples-of-profiles"></a></h1>
<ul>
<li>to discuss a fraud it is not necessarily essential, and probably often not helpful or even harmful, to suppress co-denotation.
<ul>
<li>If referentially opaque triple terms would become the standard way to represent LPG data in RDF (or if the recommendation would even suggest such an approach) we would probably shoot ourselves in the foot big time. A conversion of LPG to RDF that looses some or even much of the integration capabilities of RDF is not a compelling value proposition.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Referential opacity is useful if one is actually interested in the syntactic representation of referers
<ul>
<li>in every other case they are not only a nuisance, but outright harmful because they restrict the meaning of what is said in completely counter-intuitive ways. They work diametrically against the core purpose of RDF: concentrating on what is meant, not on how it is expressed.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<strong>Backlinks</strong>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/notes/lTim9plsY3OzVv6gn7TBR">RDF-star</a></li>
</ul>

Some Notes on the Rdf Star Examples of Profiles

public-notes


Welcome! And beware!  

## Purpose

This vault is the "[[learning-in-public|ar.swyx.learn-in-public]]" part of my Second Brain. If you share some of my interests, please [reach out](https://djradon.github.io)! 

## Contents

- [[t]] my personal wikipedia
- [[idea]] (not necessarily mine)
- Resource Notes, including highlights, thoughts and metadata, for various things:
  - [[ar]] mostly articles, papers and web pages
  - [[book]]
  - [[community]]
  - [[course]]
  - [[event]]
  - [[game]]
  - [[loc]]
  - [[org]]
  - [[user]] 
  - [[prdct]] mostly software products, but also ontologies
  - [[recipe]]
  - [[video]] movies, tv episodes, youtube, etc
- [[vs]]
- [[wanted]]
- Some "Metadata Notes":
  - [[tags]] which may refer to any and multiple (or none) of the above
  - [[c]]: ways to categorize resources
  - [[p]]: ways to assert things about resources (mostly abandoned)

In terms of the [[t.km.zettelkasten]] method, this wiki is a commingling of literature notes with something @Sönke-Ahrens warned about: a "personal Wikipedia or a database" [^1]. 

In terms of [[t.tm.getting-things-done]], it's references, someday-maybe, next actions, and public projects.

## Beware!

This is a cluttered cupboard of jumbled jottings riddled with inaccuracies, confusion, and mistakes.

## What This Is Not

- evergreen-notes/digital-garden: for "synthesized" / original-ish publishable big-idea notes that should evolve over time, props to @andy-matuschak and @maggie-appleton
- blog: for "point-in-time" items to be shared: personal news, articles, etc.
  - e.g., [[ar.substack.carpe-noctem]]


[^1]: [[book.how-to-take-smart-notes]]  