<h1 id="upper-ontologies">Upper Ontologies<a aria-hidden="true" class="anchor-heading icon-link" href="#upper-ontologies"></a></h1>
<ul>
<li>similar: <a href="/wiki/notes/3fa0re3cagbpf2ne3f0rsfe">Foundational Ontology</a></li>
</ul>
<p><img src="/wiki/assets/images/2024-06-06-12-25-20.png"></p>
<h2 id="issues">Issues<a aria-hidden="true" class="anchor-heading icon-link" href="#issues"></a></h2>
<h3 id="foundational-ontologies-need-to-be-written-in-a-language-like-kif">Foundational Ontologies need to be written in a language like KIF<a aria-hidden="true" class="anchor-heading icon-link" href="#foundational-ontologies-need-to-be-written-in-a-language-like-kif"></a></h3>
<ul>
<li>"using OWL alone would be non-sensical"</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="matching">Matching<a aria-hidden="true" class="anchor-heading icon-link" href="#matching"></a></h2>
<ul>
<li>manages semantic heterogeneity among various information sources</li>
<li>Ontology matching is semantic technology that focus to solve this issue by automating integration of distributed information sources</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="references">References<a aria-hidden="true" class="anchor-heading icon-link" href="#references"></a></h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ontology4.us/english/Ontologies/Upper-Ontologies/Concepts_Comparison/index.html">https://ontology4.us/english/Ontologies/Upper-Ontologies/Concepts_Comparison/index.html</a></li>
<li><a href="https://cw.fel.cvut.cz/b201/_media/courses/osw/lecture-08matching-h.pdf">https://cw.fel.cvut.cz/b201/_media/courses/osw/lecture-08matching-h.pdf</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/notes/9t4gwbk0fqhawfob2u74pxl">A Comparison of Upper Ontologies</a></li>
</ul>

Foundational Ontologies need to be written in a language like KIF

Upper Ontologies

public-notes


Welcome! And beware!  

## Purpose

This vault is the "[[learning-in-public|ar.swyx.learn-in-public]]" part of my Second Brain. If you share some of my interests, please [reach out](https://djradon.github.io)! 

## Contents

- [[t]] my personal wikipedia
- [[idea]] (not necessarily mine)
- Resource Notes, including highlights, thoughts and metadata, for various things:
  - [[ar]] mostly articles, papers and web pages
  - [[book]]
  - [[community]]
  - [[course]]
  - [[event]]
  - [[game]]
  - [[loc]]
  - [[org]]
  - [[user]] 
  - [[prdct]] mostly software products, but also ontologies
  - [[recipe]]
  - [[video]] movies, tv episodes, youtube, etc
- [[vs]]
- [[wanted]]
- Some "Metadata Notes":
  - [[tags]] which may refer to any and multiple (or none) of the above
  - [[c]]: ways to categorize resources
  - [[p]]: ways to assert things about resources (mostly abandoned)

In terms of the [[t.km.zettelkasten]] method, this wiki is a commingling of literature notes with something @Sönke-Ahrens warned about: a "personal Wikipedia or a database" [^1]. 

In terms of [[t.tm.getting-things-done]], it's references, someday-maybe, next actions, and public projects.

## Beware!

This is a cluttered cupboard of jumbled jottings riddled with inaccuracies, confusion, and mistakes.

## What This Is Not

- evergreen-notes/digital-garden: for "synthesized" / original-ish publishable big-idea notes that should evolve over time, props to @andy-matuschak and @maggie-appleton
- blog: for "point-in-time" items to be shared: personal news, articles, etc.
  - e.g., [[ar.substack.carpe-noctem]]


[^1]: [[book.how-to-take-smart-notes]]  